Partisanship, Lack of Personal Integrity, and the Threat to Democracy
- mb105wl
- Mar 10, 2019
- 3 min read
From "Conservatism’s Monstrous Endgame," by Paul Krugman, The New York Times, Dec. 17, 2018.
…Reed O’Conner, a partisan Republican judge in Texas known for “weaponizing” his judicial power [recently] declared the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional. Legal experts from both right and left ridiculed his reasoning and described his ruling as “raw political activism.”
…Don’t be too sure that his sabotage will be overturned. [The judge’s] abuse of power may be unusually crude, but that sort of behavior is becoming increasingly common. …The Republican assault on health care is just the leading edge of an attack on multiple fronts, as the G.O.P. tries to overturn the will of the voters and undermine democracy in general.
…While we may congratulate ourselves on the strength of our political institutions, in the end institutions consist of people and [serve their purpose] only as long as the people [who operate] them respect their intended purpose. [The] rule of law depends not just on what is written down, but also on the behavior of those who interpret and enforce that rule.
If these people don’t regard themselves as servants of the law first, partisans second; if they won’t subordinate their political goals to their duty to preserve the system; laws become meaningless and only power matters.
…What we’re seeing in America … is an invasion of our institutions by right-wing partisans whose loyalty is to party, not principle. This invasion is corroding the Republic, and the corrosion is already very far advanced.
…There are bad people in both parties… But the parties are structurally different. The Democratic Party is a loose coalition of interest groups, but the modern Republican Party is dominated by “movement conservatism,” a monolithic structure held together by big money…and the closed intellectual ecosystem of Fox News and other partisan media. And the people who rise within this movement are, to a far greater degree than those on the other side, apparatchiks, political loyalists who can be counted on not to stray from the party line.
Republicans have been stuffing the courts with such people for decades; [Judge] O’Connor was appointed by George W. Bush. That’s why his ruling, no matter how bad the legal reasoning, wasn’t a big surprise. The only question was whether he would imagine himself able to get away with such a travesty. Obviously he did, and he may well have been right.
But as I said, it’s not just the courts. Even as Trump and his allies spin fantasies about sabotage by the “deep state,” the reality is that a growing number of positions in government agencies are being occupied by right-wing partisans who care nothing, or actively oppose, their agencies’ missions. The Environmental Protection Agency is now run by people who don’t want to protect the environment, Health and Human Services by people who want to deny Americans health care.
The same takeover by apparatchiks is taking place in politics. Remember when the role of the Senate was supposed to be to “advise and consent”? Under Republican control it’s just plain consent — there is almost literally nothing Trump can do, up to and including clear evidence of corruption and criminality, that will induce senators from his party to exercise any kind of oversight.
So how do people who think and behave this way respond when the public rejects their agenda? They attempt to use their power to overrule the democratic process. When Democrats threaten to win elections, they rig the voting process, as they did in Georgia. When Democrats win despite election rigging, they strip the offices Democrats win of power, as they did in Wisconsin [and Michigan]. When Democratic policies prevail despite all of that, they use apparatchik-stuffed courts to strike down legislation on the flimsiest of grounds.
As David Frum, the author of Trumpocracy [and a former speech writer for George W. Bush], warned a year ago: “If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.” That’s happening as we speak.
Comentários